Quote from: punkst0ner on August 30, 2012, 02:44 pmYou would need to prove you are a female for a start, and then prove the avatar picture was not you.Because using your own picture as an avatar would be a dumb ass thing for a potential mod to even think about.See what I'm saying??Plus the people nominating you are the ones defending limetass and vlad. Therefore fantastic judges of character yo.Just saying.pine has never declared him/herself as being female; they've never stated one way or the other, maintaining a higher level of anonymity by doing so. Given pine's security-centric thinking, I'd lay 100 BTC on the line that the avatar is not them. (pine, if it is, please don't call me out on that bet. :P)On top of that, pine has stated that he/she does not want to be a moderator. Discussing the matter is somewhat pointless.As for Limetless, he has thus far done nothing wrong and should not be tossed into the same category as the scammer vlad1m1r. If you've seen any of my previous posts you'll notice I'm not Limetless' biggest fan, but he has not done anything wrong here and does not deserve the vitriol directed at him by so many simply because of his conversation and apparent forum-friendship with vlad1m1r. Most of us were quite fond of vlad1m1r, and none of us bar one or two expected things to turn out the way they did - you cannot label someone a scammer simply because they become pally with someone who later becomes a scammer. Doing so is an exercise in absurdity.We are all innocent until proven guilty of any crime, making it entirely unjust to judge Limetless in his absence.Wait until he returns, see what he has to say on the matter, and then people can begin to cast their respective stones at him, if they so wish. This is turning into something of a witch hunt borne solely of some people's dislike of Limetless' public persona and it is quite frankly a disgusting spectacle to witness in a place where freedom and common interest reign supreme.- grahamgreene