I don't mean to cause any conflict here but why exactly do you want things banned so much?! An excerpt from something you said yourself in another thread: "...so long as firearms are allowed and discussions on cyanide and where to source it {which 99.9% of SR forum think is fine..}..." (http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=12043.msg114269#msg114269) - if most people seem to take an agorist view on items such as cyanide, why are you looking to get it banned? Simply because you personally disagree with it? (I use cyanide as a representative example in this case.) I understand that you may have moral views on guns etc. which may cause you to disagree with them being listed, but just because you disagree with them doesn't mean they shouldn't be available to others who do agree with them. One may argue the point that listing guns may draw added LEO attention to Silk Road, and one may indeed be right, but that doesn't necessarily mean that there will be any increased risk to Silk Road - if they can't bust us now, what would make one think that they could bust us then?Getting back to the disagreeing with a particular product - I myself have an issue with heroin because of how the abuse of it by a member of my extended family has impacted on those I love, and personally I would never use it. However, I wouldn't like to see a ban on the sale of heroin because it would go against the agorist ideals of Silk Road, and because it is every person's personal choice what they do with their own body.Cyanide, for one thing, should definitely be available - if this is an issue about suicide / poisoning, there are plenty of ways to do both without using cyanide. It also has many other uses apart from the historical 'holocaust era' use. Silk Road is supposed to be an agorist marketplace, and this is an agorism-centred community, not a restrictive government-led nanny state. SR/DPR stated as much regarding defeating government restriction in his State of the Road address. Why substitute a government-imposed restriction for a restriction imposed by another entity?!Radioactive chemicals and bomb-making should also, in my opinion, be available for anyone interested in them (though sending them through the mail would be incredibly unethical due to the harm they would / could cause to unsuspecting people whilst being moved to their destination.)Again, I just felt I had to speak up on the issue - I fully respect your point of view, although I disagree with it completely. I am, however, curious as to the reasons behind it?- grahamgreene