motek: the first quote isnt mine and the quote about inert gas is out of context, I was responding to the idea that you need a giant totally inert chamber. You don't, you can make a gas blanket with argon over reactions. Also in erogline hydrolysis where most writeups use argon/nitrogen streams, etc, well that reaction produces ammonia in an equimolar amount to the ergoline feedstock, so that reaction "self-purges". Why don't you challenge my methods or say something halfway intelligent instead of crawling my posts for any little thing you can scrawl butthurt bullshit criticisms about? motek: I didnt even read your full post because I just started laughing about how much the way you talk reminded me of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c6HsiixFS8 "WHAT ARE THEY PUTTING IN OUR WATER?, WHAT ARE THEY PUTTING IN OUR OXYGEN SUPPLY?, THE VISIBLE SPECTRUM IS RAINBOWS!!11!"