Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DrDeepWood

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13
76
Off topic / Re: Submarine drones?
« on: January 14, 2013, 01:14 pm »
I dont think any device would be worth the risk in a large port area, if you are in the middle of nowhere you could just consolidate into a large narco sub. My advice is just for a specific situation.

77
this is either a joke or a first time arrest in a college town along with a lot of daddys money and a good ole boy lawyer.  If you ever get caught like this the "drugs make me do it" route can actually get you off in lue of lots of rehab and a billion years probation.

78
Off topic / Re: Submarine drones?
« on: January 14, 2013, 09:19 am »
Im not gona go into details about current technology but even during the cold war all major ports had sensor networks that could detect the smallest change in water temperature to correlate with clandestine submarine/drone/torpedo action.  Now for this kind of thing the technology is limitless and with the attack on that warship there is a lot of focus in this area.  If you do anything like this stay away from populated areas.

79
Off topic / Re: Submarine drones?
« on: January 14, 2013, 05:57 am »
I know a little bit about this area. Do not fucking around like this near major US ports.  They have very serious counter-terrorism measures in place that may not only detect something like this but may bring the entire weight of the patriot act down on your ass.

80
Off topic / Re: From methylone to MDMA
« on: January 14, 2013, 05:52 am »
Wolff–Kishner reduction, harsh conditions and shitty yields.  This is one area that needs serious research.

81
Holler at me if you really want your moneys worth in the field of chemistry education. 

82
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 12, 2013, 06:15 am »
None of the people allegedly buying 'intellectual property' from ron-SCAMMER-paul know the collective?

the-collective.ws   is one of the most dead drug forums that is, unless you are only interested in shake N bake meth.

bitfool: why dont you bring something intelligent to the table so I can cut you down too? Like maybe a real criticism of my methods? Or would you rather sit back and criticize the IDEA of me?

When the very idea of what you are doing gets haters panties in a bunch you know you are doing something right!

Quote
“Live your motherfucking life. You gotta get your motherfucking hustle. Understand niggas gonna hate you regardless. Get that outta your head—that fantasy world where niggas ain’t hating on you. You gotta be grateful. You need haters. What the fuck is you complaining about? What the fuck do you think a haters job is: to f**king hate. Let them motherfuckers do their goddamn job. What the fuck is you complaining about? Ladies, if you got 14 women hating you on you, then you need to figure out how the fuck to get to 16 before the summer gets here. What the fuck is you mad about? Fellas, if you got 20 haters, you need 40 of them motherfuckers. What the fuck is you complaining about? If there are any haters in here right now and don’t have nobody to hate on, the feel free to hate on me. Sit back there and say my hair ain’t luxurious, when you know it is, bitch.”
-Katt Williams

83
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 08:39 am »

Woahhh you got me on the spelling.

Sesamol is 1,3-benzodioxole-5-ol, just so you know for the future.
sooooooo,  just run a tosyl substitution for the hydroxy group, and then do an Sn2 under usual conditions. Can also do thionyl chlorination instead but Tsl gets better yields, can also just do a straight up halogenation. Yield for the former is usually around 80% while the latter is mid 60's. This coming from a completely legal chemical by the way.

Anything else you would like to try and correct me on?

Well id say it was more than a spelling error.  So a tosyl substitution huh? Good choice for stinking up your apartment and inviting in hazmat crews with your choice of a molar excess of pyridine or triethylamine for the scavenger base.  Either one of those chemicals in the amounts needed are gona reek to high heavens not to mention have no commercial use other than organic chemistry.  Also a SN2 on an aromatic like that will not yield the fancy leaving group you are interested in but a chloride group.  It simply will not make the product you are interested in, in any halfway decent yield. I have references if you are interested. 

Either way you are doing two SN2 reactions in a row hoping for halfway decent yields after your intense cleanup and extraction in the last step.  These reactions are very solvent, concentration and reactant dependent, something you would know if you ever tried to develop your own reaction scheme.  But no its so much easier to just pop open an ochem textbook and point at generic reactions and then try and apply them to your situation, real life isnt that simple.

You literally just pointed to some simple, first year ochem reactions that in the simplest way applied to this situation.

When I was active the one type of person I made sure never to work with was the type that had something to prove. They were worse than the junkies or the loudmouths.  They would always end up self-sabotaging because they constantly needed to impress someone or one-up somebody.

84
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 04:48 am »
d1ssonanc3: Glad you bowed out now that you ran out of accusations.  Sesamol is the correct spelling and is not the same compound as benzodioxole.  Sesamol has an alcohol group opposite to the dioxy bridge.  Even if you could figure out the proper feedstock your yields are gona be total shit.  You will end up doing more work synthesizing the safrole than you will turning that into mdma.  Have you heard of anyone on any message board synthesizing 1L+ of safrole?  Its just not viable unless you get your rocks of to total synthesis.
The reason I prefer the halosafrole route to the buffered peracid method is because to anyone but a total newb its better in every way.  People drool over that method because they look at the chemicals list and its all OTC.  Its just appealing to the uneducated eye.  The yields suck and there are a ton of manipulations involved.  With my method you dont have to do any distilling until you have already made your freebase, and thats just to remove solvent.  My method can be used to make 1kg of mdma.hcl in the same amount of effort and space as it would take you to make 10g using the peroxy.  Thanks for the free advice but I guess you get what you pay for.

85
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 03:36 am »
i'd imagine Deepwood is symholic of his phalus, inserted deeply into  rectum of any sorry hastard dum enojgh to fall for this bullshit.

 for those lookng to  ge legit, stjudy tjhe gasics of organic chemistry . its fascnating and doesnt take long. then go to tje lik i provided with the rhodium arivesl , hive archives, etc etc. You'll see these guys are cons at get..

I hope ron paul the faggot and the like disapear soon their eyesoar advertisememts. At lest list them where the belong yo sneaky faggots. Especially youj RON  PAuL, the biggiest Fag Queen of them all. Scamming no-nothing plagiarizing motherfucker.

HAHAHA ok I think your spelling says it all.  None of my methods are available via the link you provided.  My synthesis methods are not in any hive or rhodium archive.  Why would I sell something non-original?

If one of my customers recognized my methods from a free writeup online don't you think you would have heard about it by now?

86
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 03:34 am »
Quote
Your entire "I have a secret, but you can buy it for a certain amount" mentality is blasphemous to what science actually is, and for that I label you a hack.

Umm have you ever heard of the idea of a trade secret? If you think information is not valuable then you have a lot to learn.  Also, noticed you were looking for sassafras oil, good luck doing a synthesis.  I will still consult for you when you inevitably fuck up.  Post your method you are interested in using and I will tell you where you will fuck up or why my method is better.

Instead of just shit slinging why dont you bring something intelligent to the table. I will show you why I make the big bucks.

87
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 03:30 am »
Quote
If you do actually have an ergot strain congrats, but I'm still skeptical because you cant grow the damn things like mushrooms, seeing as how they arent just spores, more of a mutation.

This doesn't even make sense.  They are EASIER to grow than mushrooms, more similar to a liquid culture.

Of course you need inert gas but you dont need an entire chamber, a simple purge of argon into a flask will protect the reaction since its a heavy gas.  But really its not required, just improves yields a little bit.

88
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 11, 2013, 02:49 am »
d1ssonanc3:
Yes, I do have a sustainable ergot culture that grows in my basement.  It produces 1.5 grams of ergoline compounds per liter.  I usually run 5 gallon buckets full, you do the math.  More specifically its claviceps paspali ATCC strain 13892.  Its so safe I have dipped my hand in before.  Leme guess "OMG ERGOT will make your head fall off if you look at it wrong!!111!1" If this is hard for you to understand then you really dont know anything.

Inert gas and red lights is not required, has someone been reading old LSD synthesis writeups online?  Guess you know everything because you read a shitty synthesis using hydrazine which is older than your whore mom.  You don't need specifically colored lights, you just need lights that dont produce UV.  Its not like your synthesis will explode if you are using a small light across the room which provides synthesis light.  UV light impact on LSD will produce inert lumi-LSD.

Not only is most information online about LSD outdated, its mis-information.  LSD synthesis is not as hard as its made to seem

d1ssonanc3: what about me pisses you off so much that you will come in this thread and make yourself a fool by acting like you know anything more than anyone can learn in 15 minutes on google?

"I love how you can claim that you have "tricks and techniques" that no one else knows about, did you discover some new functional group or something?"

No, I found better ways to do things than have been made public knowledge, is that so hard for your tiny mind to understand?  Discover a new functional group? What the hell are you talking about? Do you even know what a functional group is? You cant be a day older than 16.

89
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 10, 2013, 08:34 am »
d1ssonanc3: you think theres no way to do easy LSD synthesis? Why dont you look and find the video online of nick sands making acid by the bucketful. Doesnt exactly seem like rocket science.  And with the advent of peptide coupling reactions and POCL3 addition LSD synthesis is a single reaction from lysergic acid and then a little cleanup and crystalization.  Its easier to make LSD than it is to make MDMA, its just much much much harder to get ergot based compounds to start with.  Good thing I sell a source for a fungi which produces large amounts of ergotamine when fermented like beer.

90
Rumor mill / Re: Any drdeepwood/ ron paul succesfull synths?
« on: January 10, 2013, 08:22 am »
For anyone who says my guides are ripped off rhodium or forum posts you are just flat out wrong.  Every single one of my guides has tricks and techniques you will never find posted anywhere else and is totally unique.  The only legit criticism of my guides on this forum post is that they are disorganized.  Well I may not write as well as a professional author but my guides are organized by reaction, first give a quick overview and then go through the process of the reaction.  I dont know how else you would organize it?

Most people just see my guides and go into instant hate mode, "oh well hes selling chemistry information online and there is already free chemistry information online so it must be a ripoff" or "he couldnt possibly ever done any synthesis if hes on SR not vending product".  Its just ignorant.

Have any of my customers mentioned any failed reactions? No, they are too busy wholesaling badass pure product and making mad fucking money while you guys sit around criticizing and holding your dicks.  "Those saying it can't be done shouldn't stand in the way of those doing it"

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13