ok, it's working as designed, but maybe the design needs improvement. As I've said before, the review weight is a combination of 3 factors: age (how long ago it was left), size of the transaction being reviewed, and the weight of the buyer. The weight of the buyer depends on two factors: how much they've spent on SR, and the weight of the vendors they've bought from. The weight of the vendors depends on two factors: how much buyers have spent on their items, and how recent each purchase was. With that in mind, the two 1 of 5 ratings and the one 2 of 5 rating outweigh the 111 5 of 5 ratings by a factor of 10. This is because the low ratings are for large transactions by highly rated buyers and the high ratings are for small amounts from low weight buyers. We are still working on features to help you drill down into the ratings and see why vendors are rated the way they are, which should help make situations like this more clear. I'm going to look into tweaking the weights as well. Maybe instead of the weight rising linearly with each factor, it can rise logarithmically.