466
Silk Road discussion / Scheduled maintenance Sunday
« on: April 14, 2012, 10:10 pm »
Silk Road will be down for maintenance starting at 8 pm UTC on April 15th for about an hour.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
okay so just finalized my order for 4btc and just gained another 5btc with an order making my total coins in escrow 14btc and my cash advanced limit is the same 4btc?
DPR can you better explain how the limit is set please?
Hey DPR, any word on how you'll give the grand prize winner their vacation while keeping it anonymous? Or if you can't say for some reason but you do have a plan, I understand too.
The fundamental principles that drive Rothbardian society are that you are allowed to act within your own self interest, so long as you are not violating the inalienable rights of another person (negative rights).
Do not list anything who's purpose is to harm or defraud, such as stolen items or info, stolen credit cards, counterfeit currency, personal info, assassinations, and weapons of any kind.
Do not list anything related to pedophilia.
Doesn't matter man, it's a free market. Don't feel bad about undercutting people, in fact you'll probably need to do it to get your business off the ground.
You should maybe look into having a program that rewards vendors for volume. Say a tiered monthly volume discount. That would in turn benefit everyone. It gives vendors an incentive to sell more and buyer a reason to buy more.
That dog just ain't gonna hunt because there are after all, alternatives to the Silk Road. The Silk Road provides theoretical anonymity, convenience and often times quality. But if vendors keep raising prices, the street becomes more and more attractive. Buyers are paying a premium in the form of fees for Bitcoins, Bitcoin fluctuations, and SR overhead that vendors pass on to buyers. The street is starting to look better every day. Only thing standing in the gap is having a good relationship with a vendor and their quality of service and product. Price that too high and many will be willing to forego that luxury.I think we are saying the same thing here. By adjusting your prices to the rate supported by supply and demand (maintaining a minimum inventory), not all potential buyers will make a purchase, some will seek cheaper alternatives such as local face to face vendors. That's a good thing. As you mentioned below, expanding one's operation is not easy. That's what Pharmville is struggling with as we speak. So, until supply can catch up with demand, prices need to rise. Again, that's a good thing. It encourages new vendors to set up shop and current ones to expand their operations.
Or they can simply warn customers that inventory is running low. Lots of vendors do that already. And when they are out, they often provide an ETA on their seller page and/or in the forum. Pricing things high will hurt sales because, as stated, there are alternatives to SR.You are absolutely right. There is only so much total inventory on Silk Road at any given moment and it has to be rationed in some way. That can either come through shortages and intermittent supply as you suggest, or through price rationing (there are other top-down rationing schemes governments use). The advantage of price rationing, besides there always being adequate inventory, is that it leads to a more mature and developed market with new sellers entering in to provide their wares. Over time, this leads to the low prices we were after in the first place due to competition, but has the benefit of more variety and quality, and the market is more robust. If one vendor leaves, there are others already in business that can pick up the slack (and raise their prices until new supply comes online).
You make it sound easy. Hiring help increases the risk of your business. After all, this isn't Amazon. This is drug dealing. You can't just bring any ol' player off the street as a helper. Trust is a must and any new "helper" has to be vetted. Fuck that decision up and you could end up doing time. A lot of it.If I did, I did not mean to. See my acknowledging heroes thread. What these guys go through is epic!
Suppliers know there is money to be made here. The question is just how much and what's the catch. The catch is how much is getting kicked up to boss(DPR). What's his cut? Everything else they can factor. From postage, to envelops, to couriers, to look outs, to computers and printers. They can figure out their net. But some can't justify the commission being kicked up. A better tier needs to be in place that rewards heavy hitters and big movers. (Think volume discounts in the form of monthly rebates.)There's no catch. Vendors can see everything they need to make a decision about getting into the game. The only variable is the price customers are willing to pay for the items they are considering offering. In fact it is much harder to make a decision if you see low prices followed by no inventory rather than consistent higher prices. Is there a complete gap in the market and huge profit opportunity, or am I going to be undercut as soon as the other guy re-ups?
I disagree with the notion that maximizing profits is best for everyone. That's current American business culture thinking. And it fails on many levels. Remember, just because you can, doesn't mean you should. What's better is maximizing one's value. That is good for everyone. That's the old school thinking that has stood the test of time. And it is why those of us who love Pharmville are so vocal about our love for them. They maximized their value.We might need to do some term-definitions here. What do you mean by value? Value to the customer? I agree they excelled in this regard. I don't want to pick on Pharmville because it may not even be applicable to them, but what is the value to the customer of a vendor who goes out of business because they charged too little? Does a customer value a vendor they can count on to always have product, even if it is a little more expensive, over a vendor they might have to wait a week on, and then hope to get in the queue before they run out? And don't forget my all too important caveat: Maximizing profits is best for everyone "if fraud is not present". Much of the American business culture you mention is: Maximize profits "by any means necessary". Two very different guidelines.
You're 100% correct here. But it will fall on deaf ears I'm afraid. Many a noob thinks finalizing early is the "cool" thing to do. And that's whether they have to or not. And addicts are going to take a chance because that's the nature of addiction.
Not for nothing, you've got a great thing here and I praise you for it, DPR. You're a legend. Seriously. But you have show vendors some more love. And you have been doing it. Credit where credit is do. So it's not like I'm saying you haven't. Lots of excellent implementations have gone into effect on their behalf. Vendors are taking a big risk but moreover, they make this place what it is. They made your concept, manifest. There will always be buyers of drugs. But without supply at reasonable prices, not simply prices you can get away with(AKA maximizing gains), ain't nothing going to happen here except perhaps it being given footnote credit for having started a revolution.