Silk Road Forums

Quote from: DoctorClu on February 14, 2014, 07:25:56 am

I don't see this as plausible. A staff member was not involved in this.

Hiniguel - What are you basing these claims off of? You keep posting the same thing over and over that you just "Know who did it". What is the point of this delay if it is a member of staff? If your claims are true regarding staff, I need to know who to remove access for.

The only staff members I will speak with regarding the matter are stealth and Defcon directly. I am providing stealth the evidence and he is going to forward it to Defcon.

Astro I'm not a vendor but I feel bad about the fact that I did not FE for the vendor I bought from. Can I at least speak and tell the staff my opinion when I think things weren't being done as they should have? With all due respect. I love this place but when people make mistakes, it is my very right to speak my mind.

Quote from: 3nlight3n3d on February 14, 2014, 02:33:52 am

Hey hiniguel some people been saying the PGP for defcon and the PGP defcon used in the announcement don't match up? Any thoughts?

I know for a fact Defcon is not the thief. I believe (almost have proof at this point) there is a rogue staff member, which I will only announce with full evidence. But, Defcon himself is not the thief, he needs to look at his staff carefully, because one helped the scammers with the exploit.