Ah yep, that would solve that problem. An IRC friend of mine is a big proponent of I2P and wants everyone to use it, and it does let you do some cool things, like bittorrent and human-readable pseudo-domains, but ultimately the reason I can't bring myself to use I2P and Freenet is because I can't get over the fact that my IP address is exposed to random nodes on the network. I like the privacy that entry guards afford. I also trust the relays more. There's a big, publicly accessible list of all the relays, with lots of info about them: hostname, geolocation, bandwidth, (usually real) contact info. You can see them running for months at a time, and people run scripts against them regularly to determine if they are acting maliciously. It makes me feel safer than connecting to some random, unknown IP address. There's also the fact that I2P and Freenet are so small. On Tor, you're one of 500K daily users. That's a nice, big crowd to mix in with, compared to I2P's 20K simultaneous users. I don't know how many users Freenet has, but presumably it's even fewer. The size and diversity of the Tor crowd are big privacy-protecting features. If you run a Freenet node, there's like an 80% that you're a pedophile, but if you connect to Tor, there' s maybe a 10% chance you buy drugs, a 10% chance you're a pedo, a 5% chance you're a journalist, or whistle blower, or intelligence agent, or political dissident, or just somebody who is privacy conscious, or paranoid, or curious. There are way too many groups to conclude anything about a Tor user, if you can only watch their end.