That makes sense. Property is the most widespread form of state force in the world. For some people it's a sacred cow. State force is bad, but the enforcement of property rights is an exception, and one of the few "legitimate" uses of state force. Well, first you have to demonstrate that property rights are legitimate. To me, they exist not because they are inherent in nature, but because people agree to pretend property exists. In other words, it's a social contract.