Silk Road forums

Discussion => Silk Road discussion => Topic started by: subdude on March 05, 2012, 01:27 pm

Title: SR Seller Contract
Post by: subdude on March 05, 2012, 01:27 pm
I'm a buyer, but I read the seller contract. I thought oh wow how this is broken in so very many ways. It's a good contract. A contract.
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: Reseller on March 05, 2012, 06:17 pm
I'm a buyer, but I read the seller contract. I thought oh wow how this is broken in so very many ways. It's a good contract. A contract.
In what ways do you find it is being broken subdude? I have seen small examples like when VMM threatened to release a buyers name to LEO in exchange for feedback edits. Across the board however, I would say that most vendors stick to their side of the deal.
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: onestopshop on March 05, 2012, 09:25 pm
...what the?
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: anarcho47 on March 06, 2012, 04:18 am
If you are going to toss out a blanket statement with serious allegations, I would suggest at least one instance of actual supporting evidence is in order...
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: SuperDimitri on March 06, 2012, 08:56 am
I'm a buyer, but I read the seller contract. I thought oh wow how this is broken in so very many ways. It's a good contract. A contract.
In what ways do you find it is being broken subdude? I have seen small examples like when VMM threatened to release a buyers name to LEO in exchange for feedback edits. Across the board however, I would say that most vendors stick to their side of the deal.

WTF? Link?
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: SuperDimitri on March 06, 2012, 09:16 am
I'm a buyer, but I read the seller contract. I thought oh wow how this is broken in so very many ways. It's a good contract. A contract.
In what ways do you find it is being broken subdude? I have seen small examples like when VMM threatened to release a buyers name to LEO in exchange for feedback edits. Across the board however, I would say that most vendors stick to their side of the deal.

WTF? Link?
http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=13263.0

Never saw where he admits  to saying that. I readonly  3  pages, though. But VMM denies it on the 1st page. Would like more  proof.
Either way, makes me glad I don't deal with meth.
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: SuperDimitri on March 06, 2012, 11:55 am
Well, that's about as fucked as it gets, but....Digital Alch said his account would be suspended, yet it is still active?
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: Fuk_this on April 16, 2012, 05:07 am
(OP) Despite my broadly defined analogy about contract in another thread for illustrative purposes, contracts stipulating performance of an illegal acts are unenforceable.  So.... how and to whom would you argue breach of contract? 
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: Limetless on April 16, 2012, 06:15 am
Just strolled through that thread about VMM....that's some intense and low shit....
Title: Re: SR Seller Contract
Post by: squidShepherd on April 17, 2012, 08:51 am
It seems obvious that there can be no "legal" contracts regarding business on the Silk Road. The Seller's Contract is one of morality, and, like anything based in morals, is enforced by the community.

I believe elaboration on the original point is necessary. Is the contract itself broken, referring to its drafting and construction? Or rather is it that some vendors go about breaking that agreement?

-sSh-