I would need to see any sort of evidence that demonstrates that information is actually added and retained. As far as I know there is no information that can be transferred without marginal losses of some of that information at the edges. I mean you don't actually see material effects unless you have millions of "transfers" of the exact same data, but you do start to see it.DNA is the most efficient information transfer in the universe. but there is still going to be some micro-amount of loss every time DNA is "passed on". There is no documentation regarding DNA that proves otherwise, that information somehow is magically added from nothing. There is no documentation that proves it is possible to have life, whatever that actually is, come from nothing, even the most basic of forms. Macro-evolutionists just jam a bunch of "time" in there when they can't answer certain questions. We've gone from, what, 700 million year old universe to 15 billion year old universe in the past 25 years? I suspect that number will continue to grow.So if it can't be proven that a cell can continually develop onward and upward to become hemoglobin, I can't accept that hemoglobin is stage X of some simple original cell that had life (information) added from nothing. Thus far the laws of physics don't allow for it. Statistical mathematics doesn't allow for it, because anything other than that specific arrangement of proteins makes the cell become toxic to the body it's living in. How do you answer that 'million monkeys with typewriters' question if half the keys on the typewriter are lethal to the monkeys?