SR has already posted earlier that he is going to be dealing with this issue because it is gaming the system - newbs should have to go through the ringer twice before they can get something like this up and people take it seriously.For the record, I'm currently running a lottery. That being said, I also have 500 legit transactions on SR, am the oldest weed seller on here now, and I think I've earned my stripes (how many of us are left from the days with no bitcoin hedging, when buyers and sellers were both trying to play the currency fluctuations against each other, and the only thing that kept me alive is that I do a really brisk f2f business that subsidized me while the situation was sorted out by DPR?). My review topic is over 8 months old and has over 250 posts with more than 4,700 views.The proposed system is that small listings like digital goods and lotto tickets will have no feedback weighting, or a VERY TINY weighting, so it would take thousands of these to equal out to a bulk transaction. I am fully on board for this. This is the first lotto I'm running and it's mainly for the purpose of generating some new interest in my products and to have some fun. If I do any future ones, I have already contacted SR about this, and I if I'm going to start lotto-ing out OZ's of my high end cannabis and mushrooms I will purchase a completely separate vendor's account with the express purpose of doing that, and only that.As for your 3/5, 5/5, etc. I can't agree that you should be leaving a vendor a partial feedback on a lotto order, unless you are just throwing your coins out into the ether. The system I have proposed goes like this:Buyer purchases lotto ticket(s). Once I see the order on my Orders page, I pull the username down and add it to a chronological list of all ticket/users who have purchased, and each ticket is assigned a number (so johnny123 bought the first 5 tickets, he gets numbers 1-5, sarah234 bought the next 3, she gets 6-8, and so on). I update a post on the lotto thread with the username/ticket list, and THEN I mark the item in transit. Buyers double check to make sure that their ticket count is correct, and message me if there are any errors. If there are not, they finalize the item because they have been confirmed as entered.Once the entries are complete (tomorrow night), I will use a web-based random number generator that allows me to enter outside parameters (if I have 250 total tickets, the outside parameters are 1 and 250, and the random number generator will select a number from inside that range). I will screenshot the winning number for the grand prize, and another screenshot for second place. Then I will post the winning numbers and it is up to the winning user to come take a look and see if they won. I will set up one listing for 0.01 BTC for the grand prize winner, and another for 0.01 BTC for the runner up. Item ships, they receive, everything is good.Under the new weighting system no aspect of this would really affect my rank, or the rank of the lotto account I will open if this one runs well. This is mostly a marketing thing for me, and I'm hoping to basically break even on product cost + shipping, and nothing more. If there's a couple of BTC in it to justify all the time spent updating the ticket list and such, that's cool. But I am hoping for future sales, and that is all.If you want the details, the thread for my lotto is here:http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=12153.0