Your understanding of an economic transaction is ass-backwards from reality.  When you take your money and trade it to someone else for what they are offering, you are demonstrating by your actions that you value the thing you are buying more than the money the businessman is asking for it. The businessman offers the product for the price because he values that much money more than what he has. BOTH sides of a transaction, as long as there is no violence or coercion involved, must increase the wealth by at least some modicum for BOTH parties, or else such a transaction would not exist.Again, you can't argue economics if you have no understanding of the thing. I am an anarcho-capitalist. That means that as long as my inalienable rights arent' being violated, you can do whatever in the hell you want. That includes building a $5,000 home, or spending a million dollars on a mansion and burning it to the ground. I don't care. The state is the only thing impeding you from doing this. Not voluntary private society. Of COURSE money cannot fall from the sky- money is not wealth, except by what it can buy. Wealth is capital, wealth is something useful, wealth is resources put into some utilitarian form that someone else WANTS and will voluntarily pay for.Your world view is very dangerous. I would argue that the black market, while legitimate in meeting demand of peaceful people, is no less legitimate than any other market. The costs of everything are skyrocketed due to artificial risks and restrictions imposed via violence and coercion on its participants. If everyone is out to exploit everyone than what is the point of even trying to survive. If I do work for a customer, it is becuase they want and need it, and they are OFFERING me their money in exchange for my product and services.You're talking garbled nonsense towards the end. I really hope you didn't just spend 5 years in a sociology program or some nonsense and you are using your "higher learning" and this twisted view of the world that you have. A small portion of society are violent, psycopathic, sociopathic, deranged, etc. An entity which allows the monopoly on violence (the state) attracts these types of people to it. This is the root of the problem. The reason you are on a computer right now typing this nonsense is because some entrepreneur at sometime decided that if he made one you might be willing to pay for it. He had to entice you to buy it, he didn't send PC Goons to your house to mug you and trade a computer for the cash they stole, you went out a bought one completely of your own volition. A computer is not essential to human survival, it is not food or shelter or water or clothing. it's an option to add to one's life, and you CHOSE to do it without any coercion at all.How can you possibly harp on a system in which you participate every single day without a gun to the back of your head? Your views are misguided at best, dangerous at worst, and your energies are completely misdirected. The state and the state alone deserves your ire.