You are proving my point. The market in its current form could not exist without state violence, this also shifts the power in the equation to the producer and not the consumer. Look where that has us now. You want full-fledged.This societal structure would devolve to absolute destitute within a decade. SR is not about "artisans" or "farmers". If had a mass production facility that grew marijuana and I could afford to sell it for 5 bucks a gram and make a decent profit I would - SR would not limit me from selling in the least. The state limits this sort of thing, and as such you have to be a small producer or small cooperative because to grow to big means you invite violence.The market, capitalism, is not some esoteric thing out there in the ether. It is you and me talking right now, every decision you make. You want to strip the ability of someone to OWN their own property unless it is constantly being used - so, what, if I'm a factory owner my workers murder me and take over the factory? Even though I'm not standing at every machine, loading every truck? Property rights are ingrained in human nature - it's how the natives solved over-hunting problems 400 years ago and how the majority of our environmental and living standards problems would be solved today, in one fell swoop.Again, you are referring to fascism. Capitalism has become a dirty word when all it really means is Voluntaryism - no coercion, just property rights and contracts - mutual cooperation. Again you are still talking about fascism when you talk about big pharma - the free market would not put a gun to someone's head and say "you need $800 million in resources to bring a new product to market". That's called an artificial barrier to entry. That is Pharma writing legislation for the FDA and its guns to enforce. That is the merger of corporation and state. That is fascism.