I have a couple of points of contention with your post.The first is that the "drug-types" and the "anarcho-capitalists" (the category I would consider myself to fall into, if we're doing that) are opposed. We aren't. Drug-types are claiming the right to their own body, which is a part of the idea of anarcho-capitalism. I haven't had any real conflicts with anybody over ideology on here, and I would also point out that a very small portion of the overall discussion on this site is actually devoted to the "guns or no guns on here" or "small club versus open-door policy" discussions.The vast majority of the discussion on here is, in fact, EXACTLY what anarcho-capitalism is - people interacting, peacefully for the most part, but also having conflict and attempting resolution. People vetting sellers and buying experiences because there is an intrinsic value to being the contrarian, and also to helping others either by volunteering something or exchanging/increasing wealth. This forum is a great example of how anarcho-capitalism works and I think you are just focusing on a small aspect of the community that happens to be the most conflict-rife. There are several hundreds of posts in the "drug safety" section of this forum, by people who stand to gain absolutely nothing materially from contributing their experience to those trying things out for the first time. It's really incredible.As to your point about whether we have a choice to leave it open - that rests entirely on the site's ownership. Just like you can buy from a Walmart by walking in the door, but you can't buy from a Sam's Club unless you have a membership card, it's up to SR whether he/they want to erect a barrier to entry in any way. I personally don't think they should, because the IDEA of SR is more important than this instance of it. I'm not sure why you are here, if it's just to check out something cool you heard about, to engage in trade, to offer up advice/opinions, ask questions, etc. Could be all of them. And any or all of those are fine.I dont' think that SR is currently, actively trying to keep the site hidden. The barriers to entry thus far are simply precautions against violent states who would inflict harm on people for acting of their own volition and not hurting anyone else, including and especially those who have set this place up. They are not intended to keep people out, but to let people who wish to be SAFE come in. The doors are all open, you just have to go about finding the keys on your own. Besides that, it is a sensational story and there really is no other way this will pan out except to continually increase and possible sprout clones all over the place (my own hope, as every good idea is eventually held to the accountability of competition once it becomes a market reality). Just because SR isn't posting Google Adwords ads and buying up billboard space across the world doesn't mean they are trying to keep people out - if we had no states this would be just a normal website with SSL and that's it (or it would go bankrupt becuase its competitors would be easier to get to).Every transaction that takes place on here, especially if it is watched by media and a curious public, displays the total failure and irrelevency of the State. One of the "drug types" might see it as a small triumph in getting their drug of choice and beating the "system", but the larger picture is that this in fact does stomp on millenia-old fallacies every single day, and I am thankful for that fact alone outside of the fact I can make a profit on here and people are happy to buy my product.And finally to your last point - it is logical and makes perfect sense. However states are not logical, rational creatures. They suffer from the worst form of groupthink with no natural restraining mechanisms on them. Angering a state creates massive collateral damage and just invites them to cause suffering. If the site has a groundswell bottom-up, it will make a stronger case than a sensationalism one ever could...